GREEN-CELESTINE et al v. MASUCCI et al
| STEPHEN GREEN-CELESTINE and AARON GREEN |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JANE ROES 1-10 (fictitious names), MICHAEL MASUCCI, JOHN DOES 1-10 (fictitious names), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES) |
| 2:2020cv15038 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1364 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MICHAEL MASUCCI, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11566088) with JURY DEMAND, filed by STEPHEN GREEN-CELESTINE.(ARZADI, KARIM) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Jurisdiction- U.S. defendant, Jury Demand - Pltf. only,Name - Select name if already in the system.. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
