NISIVOCCIA v. NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION
MARGARET NISIVOCCIA |
NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK |
2:2020cv15586 |
November 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stanley R Chesler |
Cathy L Waldor |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 12/17/2020. (tjg, ) |
![]() |
Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (tjg, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION.(CHARKOW, ANDREW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by RACHEL SUZANNE RUBENSTEIN on behalf of NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION (RUBENSTEIN, RACHEL) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION. (CHARKOW, ANDREW) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION from SUPERIOR COURT OF ESSEX COUNTY, case number ESX-L-006938-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11612339), filed by NATIONAL RAILROAD CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CHARKOW, ANDREW) Modified on 11/6/2020 (dam). |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps, ) |
Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.