DE LAAT v. JOHN DOES 1-25 et al
| JOANNE DE LAAT |
| JOHN DOES 1-25 and WILLIAMS RUSH & ASSOCIATES LLC |
| 2:2020cv15598 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/24/2021 at 2:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 3/22/2021. Dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference call. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 12/29/2020. (jqb, )
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by WILLIAMS RUSH & ASSOCIATES LLC.(O'BRIEN, SEAN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to WILLIAMS RUSH & ASSOCIATES LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-25, WILLIAMS RUSH & ASSOCIATES LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11613216) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOANNE DE LAAT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BABAD, ELIYAHU) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
