ABDUL-AHAD v. ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
TASKEEN ABDUL-AHAD |
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ABC GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, DETECTIVE OZIE RYALS, DETECTIVE E. SILVERIO, OFFICER EMANUEL PEREIRA, SGT. CHRISTOPHER BOZIOS, JR., OFFICER JOSE YUNQUE, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-20, DETECTIVE GINO IZZO, DETECTIVE Y. ELLIS, DETECTIVE A HOLMES and DETECTIVE E. UDVARHELY |
2:2020cv15602 |
November 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Joseph A Dickson |
John Michael Vazquez |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number NEW043909 (jr) |
Filing 5 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney ALAN R. RUDDY terminated. Attorney CHARLES R.G. SIMMONS for ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT added.. (SIMMONS, CHARLES) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: Defendants' request, (ECF No. 3), is GRANTED. Responsive pleadings must be filed on or before 1/5/21. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson on 12/2/20. (jbb) |
Filing 3 Letter from Alan Ruddy, Esq.. (RUDDY, ALAN) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by PETER WILLIAM TILL on behalf of A HOLMES (TILL, PETER) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT from Superior Court of New Jersey, case number ESX-L-006366-20., filed by ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. (Attachments: #1 Statement)(RUDDY, ALAN) |
Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson added. (ps, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.