REIFFER v. PROPER ESTATES INC. et al
| PAUL REIFFER |
| DAVEN P. SHAH and PROPER ESTATES INC. |
| 2:2020cv16345 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by PAUL REIFFER. PROPER ESTATES INC. waiver sent on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021; DAVEN P. SHAH waiver sent on 12/23/2020, answer due 2/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service - Executed for Daven Shah)(TEITELBAUM, MEIR) |
| Filing 3 AO121 Copyright Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (lag, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PROPER ESTATES INC., DAVEN P. SHAH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PROPER ESTATES INC., DAVEN P. SHAH ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11671308) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PAUL REIFFER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letters, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons - Proper Estates, #6 Proposed Summons - Daven Shah, #7 Form AO 121)(TEITELBAUM, MEIR) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
