Klick v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. et al
Paul Klick |
CHATTEM, INC., THE BOEING COMPANY, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., f/k/a ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. / BENDIX, THE B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY f/k/a GOODRICH CORPORATION, PRATT & WHITNEY POWER SYSTEMS, INC., CYPRUS MINES CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS AND SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO AMERICAN TALC COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALCCOMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALC CO., INC., AND CHARLES MATHIEU, INC., PNEUMO ABEX LLC, successor in interest to ABEX CORPORATION (ABEX), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC and IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. |
2:2020cv16654 |
November 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by THE BOEING COMPANY. (O'MALLEY, AUSTIN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by THE BOEING COMPANY from New Jersey Superior Court, Middlesex County, case number MID-L-007305-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11688545), filed by THE BOEING COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Index Ex. A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Initial Fact Sheet, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Notice to State Court of Removal to Federal Court)(O'MALLEY, AUSTIN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.