GRIFFIN v. THE CITY OF NEWARK et al
| Ahmaad Griffin |
| CITY OF NEWARK, Jovanny Crespo, HECTOR ORTIZ, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and P.O JOVANNY CRESPO |
| 2:2020cv17290 |
| November 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs re #5 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County (RABASCA, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Plaintiff's Letter request for a one cycle adjournment of the #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County so that it may be heard on 1/19/2021 etc. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 1/4/2021. (bt, )
|
|
Filing 7
Letter from Michael A. Rabasca requesting an adjournment and extension of time to file reply brief re #5 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, #6 Brief in Opposition to Motion. (RABASCA, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 6
BRIEF in Opposition filed by CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT re #5 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County (ANTOINE, WILSON)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County. Motion set for 1/4/2021 before Judge Katharine S. Hayden. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Remand to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Motion, #2 Declaration Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Rabasca Declaration, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B to Rabasca Declaration, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C to Rabasca Declaration, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D to Rabasca Declaration, #7 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Order)(RABASCA, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: In light of Plaintiffs intention to move for remand, the Court grants Defendant City of Newarks request to extend its time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until twenty (20) days after resolution of Plaintiffs remand motion. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 12/4/20. (tjg, )
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from City of Newark requesting further extension of time to respond to Complaint. (ANTOINE, WILSON)
|
|
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/18/2020. (qa, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to City of Newark. Attorney WILSON DAVID ANTOINE for CITY OF NEWARK added. (ANTOINE, WILSON)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK from Essex County Superior Court, case number ESX-L-7226-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11726532), filed by NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEWARK. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint)(LIPSHUTZ, GARY)
|
|
Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
