Kilgore v. AstraZeneca LP et al
| Michael Kilgore |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, MERCK & CO., INC. doing business as Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP |
| PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) |
| 2:2020cv17930 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Clerk's Notice to Counsel. (gh, ) |
| Filing 9 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Ohio Southern; Case Number 1:20-cv-00867. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-30): Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on MDL this action is transferred to the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 12/1/2020; certified by the Clerk's Office District of New Jersey on 12/1/2020. (er) |
| Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-30): This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the USDC for the District of New Jersey. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel on 12/1/2020. (er) |
| For all Case Management Orders #click here (gh, ) |
| Member Case Transferred in on 12/3/20 from the Southern District of Ohio 1:20-00867 for MDL 2789 PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) (gh, ) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (gh, ) |
| Case transferred to District of New Jersey. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (er) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Merck & Co., Inc. in The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case A 1902629. (bjc) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #4 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP in The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, A 1902629. (bjc) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, filed by Michael Kilgore in The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Case A1902629. (bjc) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP identifying Corporate Parent AstraZeneca LP for AstraZeneca LP; Corporate Parent AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from hamilton common pleas, case number A1902629 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7732508), filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
