KUNDRACKY et al v. TD BANK (USA), N.A. et al
| ADEL BLAND and JAMES KUNDRACKY |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and TD BANK (USA), N.A. |
| 2:2020cv19326 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JENNIFER ANN HARRIS on behalf of TD BANK (USA), N.A. (HARRIS, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JAMES KUNDRACKY, ADEL BLAND. TD BANK (USA), N.A. waiver sent on 12/28/2020, answer due 2/26/2021. (OH, KENNY) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TD BANK (USA), N.A.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TD BANK (USA), N.A. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-11824584) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JAMES KUNDRACKY, ADEL BLAND. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Settlement Letter, #2 Exhibit B - Jul 2020 Credit Report, #3 Exhibit C - FCRA Dispute Letter, #4 Exhibit D - Dec 2020 Credit Report)(OH, KENNY) |
| Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
