MORGAN et al v. TARGET et al
| TIMOTHY MORGAN and ANN E MORGAN |
| TARGET, JACY LALLY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and TARGET CORPORATION T-1929 |
| 2:2020cv20095 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 2/23/2021 at 11:30 AM before Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 1/13/21. (LM, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by JACY LALLY, TARGET, TARGET CORPORATION T-1929.(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by TARGET CORPORATION T-1929. Amended Petition for Removal. (Attachments: #1 Letter re: Amended Petition, #2 Original Petition of Removal)(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (ak, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION T-1929 identifying TARGET CORPORATION as Corporate Parent.. (MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TARGET CORPORATION T-1929 from MIDDLESEX COUNTY, case number MID-L-8022-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number BNJDC-11857780), filed by TARGET CORPORATION T-1929.(MCINTYRE, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
