JOHNSON et al v. THE CITY OF CLIFTON et al
| ZENA L. POWELL, TEO T. POWELL, THE JOHNSON-POWELL GROUP, LLC and TEO JOHNSON |
| CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE CITY OF CLIFTON ABC LICENSING BOARD |
| THE CITY OF CLIFTON |
| S & S LIQUORS, INC. also known as RAJENDRA PATEL doing business as ALLWOOD LIQUOR SHOP, S & S LIQUORS, INC. and RAJENDRA PATEL |
| 2:2020cv20118 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Letter request to Judge Kiel for U.S. Marshall process service of the summons and complaint filed on December 21st, 2020 from ZENA L. POWELL. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 7
Request for Summons to be Issued by ZENA L. POWELL as to S & S LIQUORS, INC.. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to S & S LIQUORS, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 5
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against S & S LIQUORS, INC., THE CITY OF CLIFTON, filed by THE JOHNSON-POWELL GROUP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons for third party complaint)(ld, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/2/2021: #2 20-20118 9-11-2020 Liquor store purchase for S&S LIQUOR TRANSFER TO Johnson-Powell LLC City of Clifton Application Part 1, #3 9-11-2020 Liquor store purchase for S&S LIQUOR TRANSFER TO Johnson-Powell LLC City of Clifton Application Part 2) (ld).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #3 letter request for process service of summons. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). Plaintiff has provided no basis sufficient to direct service of process as requested.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 1/19/2021. (ld, )
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from Teo Johnson received from Help Desk Email with message: Greetings! The Honorable Judge Edward S. Kiel, Please see attached letter request for Marshall service as it is time sensitive and the request has been sitting in the Marshall office since December 29th, 2020 both the request forms and the summons issued by the court, and the complaint copies for service in the clerks office since December 21st, 2020. In error I submitted the request to the Marshall office and did not follow the protocol of making a formal request to the Honorable Judge Edward S. Kiel since I have not been litigating in over two years, it completely slipped my mind. In addition, I would like to request additional time for submission of motions request as I am disabled and it takes me time to complete the briefs as I suffer from severe pain due to 2 spinal fusions and unrepaired vertebrae. I appreciate your assistance in this matter. Thank you, Zena L Powell on behalf of The-Johnson-Powell Group, LLC (sm)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF CLIFTON, THE CITY OF CLIFTON ABC LICENSING BOARD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF CLIFTON, THE CITY OF CLIFTON ABC LICENSING BOARD (Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number NEW043928) with JURY DEMAND, filed by TEO JOHNSON, ZENA L. POWELL, TEO T. POWELL. (Attachments: #1 Document in Support, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G) (jc, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
