WISE v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC et al
TUNISHA WISE |
JOHN DOES 1-25 and HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC |
2:2020cv20618 |
December 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk`s Text Order - The #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 02/19/2021. (jc, ) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint.. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by LAWRENCE J. BARTEL, III on behalf of HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TUNISHA WISE. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC served on 1/15/2021, answer due 2/5/2021. (BABAD, ELIYAHU) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ld, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-11900697) with JURY DEMAND, filed by TUNISHA WISE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BABAD, ELIYAHU) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.