Ebler, Sr. v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
John Ebler, Sr. |
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, PFIZER INC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC. and MERCK & CO INC doing business as Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation |
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) |
2:2021cv00574 |
January 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Claire C Cecchi |
Mark Falk |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Clerk's Notice to Counsel. (gh, ) |
Filing 9 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:20-cv-07558. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (gh, ) |
For all Case Management Orders #click here (gh, ) |
Member Case Transferred on 1/12/21 from the Northern District of Illinois 1:20-cv-07558 for MDL 2789 PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) (gh, ) |
Filing 8 TRANSFERRED to the District Court for the District of New Jersey, Newark Division the Electronic Record. (ec, ) |
Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Mailed notice (ec, ) |
Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL 2789 Conditional Transfer Order filed 1/4/2021, (ec, ) |
Filing 6 MAILED Notice of Removal to counsel of record. (lma, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 3/3/2021, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report.' The court will enter a scheduling order in response. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d), the removing party's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at analeah_charles@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the Joint Initial Status Report deadline. The removing party should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the opposing party has been given notice of removal. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Joint Status Report) (axc). |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pfizer Inc. re notice of removal, #1 (Rubenstein, Amy) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pfizer Inc. by Amy Michelle Rubenstein (Rubenstein, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Rubenstein, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019 L 006008) filed by Pfizer Inc. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-17760699. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Rubenstein, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.