MCPARLAND v. DELI WORKS et al
Plaintiff: Kyle Mcparland
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC, JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE DOE 1-10 and JOHN DOE CORP. 1-10
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Deli Works
Case Number: 2:2021cv01459
Filed: January 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Madeline Cox Arleo
Referring Judge: Leda D Wettre
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2021 ***Civil Case Terminated. (gh, )
March 23, 2021 Case extracted via ECF to the Northern District of California (MDL 2913 Judge William H. Orrick) (gh, )
March 22, 2021 Filing 13 Letter re #10 Statement,. (HARRINGTON, ROGER)
March 22, 2021 Filing 12 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #7 First MOTION to Remand . (HARRINGTON, ROGER)
March 22, 2021 Filing 11 BRIEF in Opposition filed by DELI WORKS re #7 First MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H)(TURPIN, SUZANNE)
March 16, 2021 Filing 10 MINUTE ENTRY FROM THE MDL PANEL dated 3/15/21: Plaintiff having failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances required by Rule 6.3(b) to justify reinstatement of the stay of the Conditional Transfer Order - the stay of CTO 56 filed on 2/2/21 is lifted(gh, )
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER - A telephone conference is set for 4/13/2021 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. At the allotted time, counsel are to dial (888) 684-8852, code 8948139. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 3/15/2021. (rn)
March 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE by JUUL LABS, INC re Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings,, that Juul's Motion for Stay (Doc. 3) (Motion Day - March 1, 2021) was Unopposed (HARRINGTON, ROGER)
March 2, 2021 Set Deadlines as to #7 First MOTION to Remand. Motion set for 4/5/2021 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, )
March 1, 2021 Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand by KYLE MCPARLAND. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Notice of Motion to Remand, #2 Certification Certification of E. Drew Britcher, #3 Exhibit Exhibits A-I, #4 Exhibit Exhibit J, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service, #6 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(BRITCHER, E.)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order from the MDL Panel Reinstating Stay of Conditional Transfer Order (Plaintiff's opposition to transfer is accepted by the Panel) (gh, )
February 16, 2021 Remark: Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:21-cv-01035, filed 02/10/2021. (gh, )
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order of MDL Panel transferring case to the Northern District of California.(MDL 2913 CTO 56 Judge William H. Orrick, III) (gh, )
February 10, 2021 Case extracted via ECF to the Northern District of California. (gh, )
February 8, 2021 Filing 4 Exhibit to #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Third Party Complaint by JUUL LABS, INC. (HARRINGTON, ROGER)
February 8, 2021 Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Final Order on Transfer to MDL No. 2913, #2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Third Party Complaint. Motions set for 3/1/2021 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, these motions will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, )
February 8, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - A Proposed Order was not submitted with the #2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Third Party Complaint filed by Roger Harrington on 2/5/21. PLEASE SUBMIT THE PROPOSED ORDER ONLY using the event Exhibit (to Document) and link back to the motion. (jc, )
February 5, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Final Order on Transfer to MDL No. 2913 by JUUL LABS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Declaration McGinn Declaration, #4 Certificate of Service Cert of Service)(HARRINGTON, ROGER)
February 5, 2021 Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Third Party Complaint by JUUL LABS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(HARRINGTON, ROGER)
February 1, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Attorney Information, Caption, Cause of Action, Jury Demand, Nature of Suit, Party Information, Removal-Other Court Information. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jc, )
January 30, 2021 Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps)
January 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JUUL LABS, INC from Superior Court of New Jersey (Morris County, Law Division), case number L-655-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12059126), filed by JUUL LABS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Statement Corporate Disclosure)(HARRINGTON, ROGER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCPARLAND v. DELI WORKS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Deli Works
Represented By: SUZANNE I. TURPIN
Represented By: GINO PETER MECOLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Mcparland
Represented By: E. DREW BRITCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC
Represented By: ROGER J. HARRINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE DOE 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE CORP. 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?