MAGLIOLI et al v. ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I et al
| ESTATE OF JOSEPH MAGLIOLI, DANTE MAGLIOLI, ESTATE OF DALE PETRY, CHRISTOPHER PETRY and BERNARD MAGLIOLI |
| ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM, LOUIS SCHWARTZ, ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE, ABC AND XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10, ALTITUDE INVESTMENTS LTD, HEALTHCARE SERVICE GROUP, ALTITUDE HEALTH SERVICES INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv02114 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Letter requesting extension of time to file opposition and reply briefs. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 4/5/2021. (ams, )
|
| Filing 12 Letter from Defendants regarding extension request for opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. (MILLER, MALINDA) |
| Resetting Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand . Motion reset for 4/19/2021 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Opposition due 4/5/2021. Reply due 4/12/2021. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (nic, ) |
| Filing 11 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion filed by ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM, LOUIS SCHWARTZ re #7 MOTION to Remand (MILLER, MALINDA) |
| Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 4/5/2021 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (JB, ) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Order text by All Plaintiffs re #7 MOTION to Remand . (MARCHESE, DANIEL) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #7 MOTION to Remand brief statement of facts, #7 MOTION to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (MARCHESE, DANIEL) |
| Filing 8 Exhibit to Document - Corrected Brief re #7 MOTION to Remand brief statement of facts by All Plaintiffs. (MARCHESE, DANIEL) Modified on 3/10/2021 (ams, ). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(MARCHESE, DANIEL) |
| Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Remand . Motion set for 4/5/2021 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Text of Proposed Order filed at D.E. #7 by Daniel Marchese contains the incorrect case number. Please refile using the event "Proposed Order" found under Other Documents and link it to D.E. #7 . (ams, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Per Counsel, please disregard the Motions filed at D.E.'s #6 , #8 and #9 as they were filed incorrectly. D.E. #8 has been edited to reflect that it is the corrected Brief for D.E. #7 Motion to Remand. In the future, to file corrected documents, please use the event "Exhibit to Document" found under Other Documents. This message is for informational purposes only. (ams, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(MARCHESE, DANIEL) |
|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 4/27/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 2/22/2021. (seb)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM, LOUIS SCHWARTZ. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(MILLER, MALINDA) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM, LOUIS SCHWARTZ. (MARTINO, SALVATORE) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM, LOUIS SCHWARTZ. (MARTINO, SALVATORE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, LOUIS SCHWARTZ, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, case number SSX-L-000176-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12099338), filed by ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER II, LOUIS SCHWARTZ, CHAIM SCHEINBAUM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Initial Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Second Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Docket Report, #5 Exhibit E - Statement of Interest, #6 Exhibit F - Certifications Combined, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplement Supplement to CIS, #9 Notice to Federal Court re State Removal)(MARTINO, SALVATORE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
