MACAN v. HANSSEM CORPORATION et al
| ROBERT MACAN |
| HANSSEM CORPORATION and JOHN SONG |
| 2:2021cv02278 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HANSSEM CORPORATION, JOHN SONG. (KAROUSATOS, GEORGE) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by HANSSEM CORPORATION, JOHN SONG. (Attachments: #1 Stip Extending Time to Answer)(KAROUSATOS, GEORGE) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet served on John Song on February 24, 2021, filed by ROBERT MACAN. (GIRONDA, STEPHANIE) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet served on Hanssem Corporation on February 25, 2021, filed by ROBERT MACAN. (GIRONDA, STEPHANIE) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to HANSSEM CORPORATION, JOHN SONG. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HANSSEM CORPORATION, JOHN SONG ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12112091) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ROBERT MACAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
