LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF |
SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. |
2:2021cv02641 |
February 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Mark Falk |
John Michael Vazquez |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF in the amount of $27,559.79 against SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 3/18/2021. (sm) |
Filing 4 ORDER CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD that the Opinion and Award of 12/18/2018 shall and hereby are Confirmed. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 21-2641. (sm) |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration award . Motion set for 3/15/2021 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration award by LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (Attachments: #1 STATEMENT, #2 ORDER, #3 JUDGMENT, #4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE)(PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12132205.), filed by LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER, #2 CIVIL COVER SHEET)(PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SOLAR-MITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: LOCAL UNION NO. 456, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF | |
Represented By: | BRADLEY MARK PARSONS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.