PARTRIDGE v. VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC. et al
Plaintiff: RICHARD PARTRIDGE
Defendant: DOMENIC SERAFINO, MICHELE THOMPSON, CHAD ZARING, VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., ANNA GEORGIADIS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20
Case Number: 2:2021cv03395
Filed: February 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: John Michael Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Second MOTION to File Answer Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint through 6/15/2021, etc. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 4/15/2021. (lag, )
April 14, 2021 Filing 7 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING. (LEVINSON, GABRIEL)
April 14, 2021 Set Deadlines as to #7 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Extension of Time to Answer Amended Complaint. Motion set for 5/17/2021 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, )
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer plaintiff's complaint through 4/16/2021, etc. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 3/5/2021. (lag, )
March 5, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised that the #5 Motion for an extension of time filed by GABRIEL LEVINSON on 3/3/2021 was submitted incorrectly as a 6.1 application for a Clerk's Order for an extension of time. Please be further advised that pursuant to L.C.R 6.1(b) the time to answer can be extended once for a period not to exceed 14 days on order granted by the Clerk. This submission will be considered - such as it is - and remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (lag, )
March 3, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Defendants Venus Concept USA, Inc.'s and Chad Zaring's Application for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Amended Complaint by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING. (LEVINSON, GABRIEL)
February 24, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (ak, )
February 24, 2021 Filing 4 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING. (LEVINSON, GABRIEL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by GABRIEL LEVINSON on behalf of VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING (LEVINSON, GABRIEL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC. identifying VENUS CONCEPT LTD. as Corporate Parent.. (LEVINSON, GABRIEL)
February 24, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING from SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY BERGEN COUNTY, case number BER-L-007658-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12182022), filed by VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., CHAD ZARING. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LEVINSON, GABRIEL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARTRIDGE v. VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOMENIC SERAFINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHELE THOMPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHAD ZARING
Represented By: GABRIEL LEVINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC.
Represented By: GABRIEL LEVINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANNA GEORGIADIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD PARTRIDGE
Represented By: MARC W. GARBAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?