CZAR INCORPORATED v. STILES MACHINERY, INC. et al
CZAR INCORPORATED |
J. SCOTT CRUICKSHANK, RSA SOLUTIONS, JOHN DOES 1-5, JULIE RICHTER, STILES MACHINERY, INC., ABC CORP. 1-5, MILLWORK DETAILS & TECHNOLOGY, BILL WATTERS and JAMES KLOB |
2:2021cv03483 |
February 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Andre M Espinosa |
Leda D Wettre |
Susan D Wigenton |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 4/16/2021. (ams, ) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by CZAR INCORPORATED. (LEDDY, FRANCIS) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre no longer assigned to the case. (smf, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to J. SCOTT CRUICKSHANK, JAMES KLOB, MILLWORK DETAILS & TECHNOLOGY, JULIE RICHTER, RSA SOLUTIONS, STILES MACHINERY, INC., BILL WATTERS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12186680) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CZAR INCORPORATED.(LEDDY, FRANCIS) |
Case Assigned to Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.