MAZZARA v. ROBUST ENTERPRISE CORP. et al
| IOLANDA MAZZARA |
| ROBUST ENTERPRISE CORP. doing business as LACE WAYNE and SIMONE MIR |
| 2:2021cv04609 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SIMONE MIR, ROBUST ENTERPRISE CORP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #1 Complaint submitted by Clara Lam on 3/9/21 appears to have address information that does not match the court's records for this case. Please go to www.pacer.gov (Manage My Account) to update your information. (jc, ) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by IOLANDA MAZZARA as to SIMONE MIR. (LAM, CLARA) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by IOLANDA MAZZARA as to ROBUST ENTERPRISE CORP.. (LAM, CLARA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SIMONE MIR, ROBUST ENTERPRISE CORP. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12247060) with JURY DEMAND, filed by IOLANDA MAZZARA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAM, CLARA) |
| Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
