IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF DISMATRIX SPC; ASYNDETON & POLYSYNDENTON (APPLICANTS) FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1782
| DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON and ASYNDETON |
| GAURAV PATEL |
| EX PARTE APPLICATION PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1782 FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY OF GUARAV PATEL FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING |
| 2:2021cv04619 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice fee: $ 150, receipt number CAM012628 (rtm, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David G. Keyko, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 4/15/2021. (lag, )
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice / Notice of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for David G. Keyko. Motion set for 5/17/2021 before Judge Brian R. Martinotti. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JOHN PINTARELLI on behalf of ASYNDETON, DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON (PINTARELLI, JOHN) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice / Notice of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for David G. Keyko by ASYNDETON, DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON. (Attachments: #1 Application and Certification, #2 Certification of David Keyko, #3 Statement, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certification of Service)(STOCKWELL, MATTHEW) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice / Notice of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for David G. Keyko. Motion set for 5/17/2021 before Judge Brian R. Martinotti. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by ASYNDETON, DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON. (STOCKWELL, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting the #1 Ex Parte Application, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 3/12/21. (jc, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jc, ) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ASYNDETON, DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON identifying NKGB SA as Corporate Parent.. (STOCKWELL, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Actions by ASYNDETON, DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON re #1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory (STOCKWELL, MATTHEW) Modified on 3/10/2021 (dam). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory ( Filing fee $ 47 receipt number ANJDC-12247208.), filed by DISMATRIX SPC, POLYSYNDETON, ASYNDETON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Subpoena to Produce Documents, #2 Exhibit B Subpoena to Testify, #3 Memorandum of Law, #4 Exhibit A Declaration of Kasra Nouroozi Shambayati, #5 Exhibit B Order, #6 Exhibit C Arizona Order, #7 Exhibit D Illinois order, #8 Exhibit E NJ Oak Trust Ex-Parte Application and Subpoenas, #9 Exhibit F NJ Oak Trust Memorandum of Law, #10 Text of Proposed Order, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(STOCKWELL, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
