HONE v. THOMPSON et al
Plaintiff: RICHARD HONE
Defendant: HON. ANNE E. THOMPSON, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, MARLENE LYNCH-FORD, LINDA BAKER, TAYLOR TOSCANO, KATHRYN MORRIS, LINDA BAXTER and MARLENE FORD
Case Number: 2:2021cv04991
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: John Michael Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned sent to RICHARD HONE (bt, )
April 21, 2021 USPS Tracking Number 7018 1830 0000 9606 2485 for #6 Opinion & Order (jc, )
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION & ORDER directing the Clerk to refile the Complaint under Civil Action No. 21-9544 as an Amended Complaint under Docket No. 21-4991, to file a copy of this Opinion and Order under both Civil Action No. 21-9544 and Civil Action 21-4991, and to close Civil Action No. 21-9544. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), etc. The Clerk shall close this matter. (Copy of Opinion and Order sent to Plaintiff by certified mail return receipt and reg mail). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 4/21/21. (jc, )
April 9, 2021 Filing 4 Exhibit 3 to #1 Complaint Received by RICHARD HONE. (ld, )
April 6, 2021 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LINDA BAXTER, MARLENE FORD, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, KATHRYN MORRIS, ANNE E. THOMPSON, TAYLOR TOSCANO, filed by RICHARD HONE. (jc, )
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION & ORDER that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), Plaintiff Richard Hones application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); Plaintiffs Complaint against Judge Thompson is DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff is afforded thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies as set forth above as to the remaining Defendants. Failure to file an amended complaint within this time will result in the entire case being dismissed with prejudice; the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff by regular mail and by certified mail return receipt. ANNE E. THOMPSON terminated. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 3/29/2021. (sm)
March 29, 2021 COMPLAINT #1 against LINDA BAKER, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, MARLENE LYNCH-FORD, filed by RICHARD HONE (IFP Granted).(sm)
March 15, 2021 Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Received by RICHARD HONE. (bt, )
March 12, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(bt, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/15/2021: #2 Text of Proposed Order) (bt, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HONE v. THOMPSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HON. ANNE E. THOMPSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARLENE LYNCH-FORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LINDA BAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAYLOR TOSCANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHRYN MORRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LINDA BAXTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARLENE FORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD HONE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?