D'ALLESSANDRO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| ANTHONY D'ALLESSANDRO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERV., NJ GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, HON. JUDGE FREYDA WOLFSON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NJ, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NJ, WARDEN GUY CIRELLO and DIRECTOR ALFONSO ORTIZ |
| 2:2021cv05009 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER that #2 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied without prejudice. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk on 4/23/21. (jc, )
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by ANTHONY D'ALLESSANDRO.(ld, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint by ANTHONY D'ALLESSANDRO. (jc, )
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. Motion set for 4/19/2021 before Judge Claire C. Cecchi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Envelope)(pnm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
