BONNER v. UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.
| FAIRRY BONNER |
| UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. |
| 2:2021cv05619 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 6/7/2021 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jc, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC.. Responses due by 5/14/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Declaration of Corey M. Scher, #3 Exhibit (Unreported Opinions), #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certificate of Service)(SCHER, COREY) |
| Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant United Collection Bureau, Inc.. Attorney COREY M. SCHER for UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. added. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SCHER, COREY) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 4/26/2021. (ams, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by FAIRRY BONNER. UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. served on 3/22/2021, answer due 4/12/2021. (KAPLAN, BEN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jc, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12276514) with JURY DEMAND, filed by FAIRRY BONNER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KAPLAN, BEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BONNER v. UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FAIRRY BONNER | |
| Represented By: | BEN A. KAPLAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED COLLECTION BUREAU, INC. | |
| Represented By: | COREY M. SCHER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
