HESLIN v. CVS PHARMACY
| JOHN T HESLIN and JOHN T. HESLIN |
| NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C. and CVS PHARMACY |
| 2:2021cv06698 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by CVS PHARMACY identifying CVS Health Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (KORN, PETER)
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Caption, Party Information. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jc, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, case number MID-L-1106-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12304939), filed by NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Service of Process, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Declaration of Melanie St. Angelo)(KORN, PETER)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk. (jr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
