THOMAS v. WILLIAMS et al
| JAMES WALTER THOMAS, III |
| DAE K SHIN, DAE K. SHIN & CO., ANDRE R WILLIAMS, DAE KUN SHIN and ANDREW SHIN |
| 2:2021cv08446 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by NICHOLAS PELLEGRINO on behalf of JAMES WALTER THOMAS, III (PELLEGRINO, NICHOLAS)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by JAMES WALTER THOMAS, III. DAE K. SHIN & CO. served on 5/3/2021, answer due 5/24/2021; ANDRE R WILLIAMS served on 5/6/2021, answer due 5/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service on Andre Williams)(PELLEGRINO, NICHOLAS)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to DAE K. SHIN & CO., DAE KUN SHIN, ANDRE R WILLIAMS. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, )
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12345609), filed by JAMES WALTER THOMAS, III.(EINHORN, KATHLEEN)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
