CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM |
SCOTT A. SMITH, CELGENE CORPORATION, TERRIE CURRAN and PHILIPPE MARTIN |
2:2021cv09606 |
April 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
John Michael Vazquez |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. CELGENE CORPORATION waiver sent on 4/27/2021, answer due 6/28/2021; TERRIE CURRAN waiver sent on 4/27/2021, answer due 6/28/2021; PHILIPPE MARTIN waiver sent on 4/27/2021, answer due 6/28/2021; SCOTT A. SMITH waiver sent on 4/27/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (GREENBERG, BRUCE) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CELGENE CORPORATION, TERRIE CURRAN, PHILIPPE MARTIN, SCOTT A. SMITH. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CELGENE CORPORATION, TERRIE CURRAN, PHILIPPE MARTIN, SCOTT A. SMITH ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12381394) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(GREENBERG, BRUCE) |
Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.