ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC. v. CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC
Plaintiff: ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.
Defendant: CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv09791
Filed: April 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2021 Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Seal Materials Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(c). Motion set for 6/7/2021 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, )
May 4, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Seal Materials Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(c) by ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Nicholas K. Lagemann in Support of Motion to Seal Materials Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(c), #2 Index Index to Certification of Nicholas K. Lagemann in Support of Motion to Seal Materials Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(c), #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(LAGEMANN, NICHOLAS)
May 3, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.. CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC waiver sent on 4/30/2021, answer due 6/29/2021. (LAGEMANN, NICHOLAS)
April 21, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, )
April 20, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.. (LAGEMANN, NICHOLAS)
April 20, 2021 Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint by ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(LAGEMANN, NICHOLAS)NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court.
April 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12388769), filed by ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAGEMANN, NICHOLAS)
April 20, 2021 Judge Kevin McNulty and Chief Mag. Judge Mark Falk added. (ps)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC. v. CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARGO INNOVATION LABS, INC.
Represented By: NICHOLAS KORD LAGEMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CELSIUS NETWORKS LENDING, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?