RABAH v. RUSSO et al
| RABAH KHALED RABAH |
| MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL RUSSO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and JOHN TSOUKARIS |
| 2:2021cv10707 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Julien Xavier Neals |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals for all further proceedings. Judge Madeline Cox Arleo no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/30/2021. (smf)
|
|
Filing 1
First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-12435893.), filed by Rabah Kahlid Rabah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit DHS Form I-286, #3 Exhibit I-862 "Notice to Appear", #4 Exhibit October 29, 2019 IJ Decision, #5 Exhibit BIA Decision, #6 Exhibit OIL Motion to Remand, #7 Exhibit Third Circuit Court of Appeals Order, #8 Exhibit BIA Briefing Order, #9 Exhibit November 20, 2020 IJ Order on Custody, #10 Exhibit IJ Order denying Guerrero-Sanchez Hearing, #11 Exhibit Evidence in Support of Bond Hearing, #12 Exhibit IJ Order Denying Joseph Hearing, #13 Exhibit ICE Denial of Parole)(ASHUR, STEVEN)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. (jr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
