SCIBILIA v. MRS BPO, L.L.C. et al
MRS BPO, L.L.C. and JOHN DOES 1 TO 10 |
EDWARD SCIBILIA |
2:2021cv12684 |
June 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
John Michael Vazquez |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by MRS BPO, L.L.C.. (POWIETRZYNSKI, ALEKSANDER) |
Filing 5 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 9/7/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 6/30/2021. (seb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by YONGMOON KIM on behalf of EDWARD SCIBILIA (KIM, YONGMOON) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by MRS BPO, L.L.C..(POWIETRZYNSKI, ALEKSANDER) |
Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MRS BPO, L.L.C. identifying MRS Associates, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (POWIETRZYNSKI, ALEKSANDER) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MRS BPO, L.L.C. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, case number ESX-L-003614-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12554651), filed by MRS BPO, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Copy of Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(POWIETRZYNSKI, ALEKSANDER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.