YEBES v. SWEENEY et al
| JOHN YEBES |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CINDY SWEENEY |
| 2:2021cv12883 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court make a copy of the Petition in Civ. No. 21-12883, and file it as an "Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" in Civ. No. 21-12810; The Clerk of the Court shall also make a copy of the Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel in Civ. No. 21-12883, and make a corresonding filing in Civ. No. 21-12810; The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 7/29/2021. (ams, )
|
| Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono. Motion set for 7/19/2021 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by JOHN YEBES. (ams, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOHN YEBES. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Application IFP, #3 Envelope)(ams, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
