LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. v. BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC et al
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A. and LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A.
Defendant: DOES 1-10, BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC and YOEL RODRIGUEZ
Case Number: 2:2021cv13198
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Andre M Espinosa
Referring Judge: Brian R Martinotti
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. identifying EssilorLuxottica as Corporate Parent.. (GILLER, RONALD)
July 6, 2021 Filing 7 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (jc, )
July 6, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC, YOEL RODRIGUEZ. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jc, )
July 1, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by QING HUA GUO on behalf of LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A. (GUO, QING)
July 1, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A.. (GILLER, RONALD)
July 1, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A. as to YOEL RODRIGUEZ. (GILLER, RONALD)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A. as to BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC. (GILLER, RONALD)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC, DOES 1-10, YOEL RODRIGUEZ ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12597625) with JURY DEMAND, filed by LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GILLER, RONALD)
July 1, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. (ak, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. v. BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BUENAVISTA MULTISERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YOEL RODRIGUEZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP, S.p.A.
Represented By: QING HUA GUO
Represented By: RONALD A. GILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A.
Represented By: RONALD A. GILLER
Represented By: QING HUA GUO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?