SIDDALL v. U.S. CONCRETE, INC. et al
MIKE SIDDALL |
U.S. CONCRETE, INC., MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, SUSAN M. BALL, KURT M. CELLAR, RAJAN C. PENKAR, RONNIE PRUITT, THEODORE P. ROSSI and COLIN M. SUTHERLAND |
2:2021cv13613 |
July 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stanley R Chesler |
Michael A Hammer |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SUSAN M. BALL, KURT M. CELLAR, MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, RAJAN C. PENKAR, RONNIE PRUITT, THEODORE P. ROSSI, COLIN M. SUTHERLAND, U.S. CONCRETE, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (ams, ) |
Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer added. (ps) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MIKE SIDDALL. (HALPER, ZACHARY) |
Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by MIKE SIDDALL as to SUSAN M. BALL, KURT M. CELLAR, MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, RAJAN C. PENKAR, RONNIE PRUITT, THEODORE P. ROSSI, COLIN M. SUTHERLAND, U.S. CONCRETE, INC.. (HALPER, ZACHARY) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SUSAN M. BALL, KURT M. CELLAR, MICHAEL D. LUNDIN, RAJAN C. PENKAR, RONNIE PRUITT, THEODORE P. ROSSI, COLIN M. SUTHERLAND, U.S. CONCRETE, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12628192) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MIKE SIDDALL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HALPER, ZACHARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.