LARA v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al
NOEMI SANCHEZ LARA |
JOHN DOE 1-10 (FICTITIOUSLY NAMED), ABC CO 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), XYZ CORPORATION 1-10 (Ficticiously named construction, maintenance, repair and/or property management corporations), JOHN DOE 1-10, ABC CO. 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATION 1-10 |
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION |
2:2021cv14114 |
July 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Julien Xavier Neals |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 11/18/2021 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/13/2021. (seb) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against ABC CO. 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10, XYZ CORPORATION 1-10 by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.(BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12657359), filed by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BERKELEY, LAWRENCE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.