GORDON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
| MR. SHYEIM GORDON |
| CITY OF NEWARK, EDWARD GARCIA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA), DEA DOES 1-10, NEWARK DOES 1-10, STATE DOES 1-10 and STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE DIVSION OF STATE POLICE OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY |
| 2:2021cv14300 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 48 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CITY OF NEWARK, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA), EDWARD GARCIA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE DIVSION OF STATE POLICE OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF NEWARK, DEA DOES 1-10, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION (DEA), EDWARD GARCIA, NEWARK DOES 1-10, STATE DOES 1-10, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12669863) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SHYEIM GORDON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GULYAS, JOHN) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
