CG HEALTHCARE, LLC v. AETNA HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff: CG HEALTHCARE, LLC doing business as CEDAR HILL HEALTHCARE
Defendant: AETNA HEALTH, INC.
Case Number: 2:2021cv16476
Filed: September 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Edward S Kiel
Referring Judge: John Michael Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Medicare
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for filing a responsive motion or pleading shall be November 4, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 9/24/2021. (qa, )
September 23, 2021 Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by AETNA HEALTH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MCCOY, BENJAMIN)
September 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 LETTER ORDER: A telephonic initial scheduling conference shall be held on November 16, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The dial in number is 1-888-684-8852 and the access code is 310-0383#. The parties shall file a proposed Joint Discovery Plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form Joint Discovery Plan can be found # here. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 9/12/2021. (sms)
September 9, 2021 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by AETNA HEALTH, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 9/23/2021. (qa, )
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants time to answer, move or otherwise reply to Plaintiff's Complaint.. (MCCOY, BENJAMIN)
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AETNA HEALTH, INC. identifying CVS Health Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (MCCOY, BENJAMIN)
September 7, 2021 Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Attorney is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (qa, )
September 2, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, )
September 2, 2021 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, )
September 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AETNA HEALTH, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, case number MRS-L-001664-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12771865), filed by AETNA HEALTH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(MCCOY, BENJAMIN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CG HEALTHCARE, LLC v. AETNA HEALTH, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CG HEALTHCARE, LLC doing business as CEDAR HILL HEALTHCARE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AETNA HEALTH, INC.
Represented By: BENJAMIN MCCOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?