HARTMANN v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.
| Thomas Hartmann |
| ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. |
| 2:2021cv17241 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| James B Clark |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 12/20/2021 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.. Responses due by 12/20/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service Cert of Service)(WALKER, KEVIN) |
Filing 6
Order to Refund Fees (Finance notified). Signed by Chief Deputy Clerk Theresa L. Burnett on 11/04/2021. (mps)
|
| Filing 5 Application for Refund of Fees (finance notified).. (KALLMANN, STANLEY) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO L OCAL CIVIL RULE 6.1(b) that Defendants time to answer, move or otherwise reply to the complaint is extended to 11/18/2021; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 10/5/2021. (sm)
|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. has been DENIED. (bt, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Complaint. Attorney KEVIN B. WALKER for ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. added. (WALKER, KEVIN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please by advised that the Complaint filed by STANLEY W. KALLMANN on 9/21/2021 was submitted as a single attachment. In future filings, it is kindly requested that all attachments and exhibits be separated from the main complaint document at the time of filing. This message is for informational purposes only. (bt, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12819858), filed by Thomas Hartmann.(NICHOLS, RICHARD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (ak, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HARTMANN v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Hartmann | |
| Represented By: | STANLEY W. KALLMANN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. | |
| Represented By: | KEVIN B. WALKER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
