PHIPPS v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE
| GEORGE PHIPPS |
| BOROUGH OF ROSELLE |
| 2:2021cv17625 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 BRIEF in Opposition filed by GEORGE PHIPPS re #7 First MOTION to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer for Failure to State a Claim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BURKE, CHRISTINE) |
| Set Deadlines as to #7 First MOTION to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer for Failure to State a Claim. Motion set for 12/6/2021 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (lag, ) |
Filing 8
LETTER ORDER: Initial Conference set for 1/6/2022 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 11/4/21. (LM, )
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer for Failure to State a Claim by BOROUGH OF ROSELLE. Responses due by 11/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief Memo of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer, #2 Affidavit Certification of Counsel with Exhibits, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(ANVARI, ALIZA) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BOROUGH OF ROSELLE. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE served on 10/12/2021, answer due 11/2/2021. (ANVARI, ALIZA) |
| Filing 5 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by GEORGE PHIPPS. (BURKE, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BOROUGH OF ROSELLE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ALIZA ANVARI on behalf of BOROUGH OF ROSELLE (ANVARI, ALIZA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTINE ELAINE BURKE on behalf of GEORGE PHIPPS (BURKE, CHRISTINE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOROUGH OF ROSELLE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12837641) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GEORGE PHIPPS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(KARPF, ARI) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PHIPPS v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GEORGE PHIPPS | |
| Represented By: | CHRISTINE ELAINE BURKE |
| Represented By: | ARI R. KARPF |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BOROUGH OF ROSELLE | |
| Represented By: | ALIZA ANVARI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
