WALSH v. CHIMI BURGERS LLC et al
| MARTIN J. WALSH |
| CHIMI BURGERS LLC doing business as CHIMI BURGERS, CHIMI BURGERS 36 MARKET STREET doing business as CHIMI BURGERS and CARLOS REYES |
| 2:2021cv17861 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Esther Salas |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting the Secretary of Labor's request until 12/29/2021 to effectuate service; for the purpose of good docket management, the motion to compel compliance with the administrative subpoenas #1 must be administratively terminated on 12/29/2021 if service is not accomplished by that date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 10/28/2021. (sm)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Stacy Goldberg. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(GOLDBERG, STACY) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: The Court has reviewed petitioner's letter of October 22, 2021 (Letter). (ECF No. #4 ) In the Letter, petitioner asserts that "mailing of the subpoena enforcement papers under Rule 5 constitutes proper service." (Id.) However, petitioner further states that "should the court not accept service under Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, [petitioner] respectfully requests that this Court allow additional time for [petitioner] to effectuate service." The Court does not "accept service" and, further, cannot provide an advisory opinion on whether petitioner has properly served respondents. If petitioner wishes to continue to request additional time to effectuate service, petitioner should file a further letter. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 10/25/2021. (sms)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Stacy Goldberg re #3 Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(GOLDBERG, STACY) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MARTIN J. WALSH re #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas (Fee exemption selected) (GOLDBERG, STACY) |
|
Filing 2
TEXT ORDER: For administrative reasons, the return date for the motion to compel compliance with administrative subpoenas (ECF No. #1 ) is set for November 15, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 10/12/2021. (sms)
|
| Reset Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas (Fee exemption selected). Motion reset for 11/15/2021 before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms) |
| Set Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas (Fee exemption selected). Motion set for 11/1/2021 before Judge Esther Salas. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas (Fee exemption selected), filed by MARTIN J. WALSH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Brief Memorandum of Law, #3 Declaration Declaration of Thomasz Ng, #4 Declaration Declaration of Stacy M. Goldberg, #5 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(GOLDBERG, STACY) |
| Case assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
