QUINONES v. RAMIREZ et al
| KEVIN QUINONES |
| JUDGE RAMIREZ, IAN LIBERTY, THOMAS MCQUILLAN, JOHN CARDONNA, JUDGE PORTELLI, BILLY CANN, ANDREW PALESTINI, MEG TILLER, IMRE KARASZEGI, PASSAIC CO., SUPERIOR COURT and PASSAIC CO. PUBLIC DEF. OFFICE |
| 2:2021cv18086 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. The Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of entry of this Order to submit a complete in forma pauperis application or the filing and administrative fees. Upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or payment of the filing and administrative fees within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case. etc. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 10/27/2021. (qa, )
|
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Letter complaint, #2 Inmate grievance form, #3 Application IFP, #4 Envelope)(jd,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
