MELEIKA v. CITY OF BAYONNE
STEVEN MELEIKA |
CITY OF BAYONNE |
2:2021cv18221 |
October 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Kevin McNulty |
Cathy L Waldor |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: No action will be taken on DE #7 . This case was administratively terminated for failure to pay a filing fee or move for in forma pauperis status (DE #6 ). Plaintiff's request that this case be merged with Amgad Meleika v. Bayonne (docket number not stated, but possibly a reference to 17-cv-05678) would be denied in any event. Case 17cv05678 terminated in 2019. So Ordered by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/26/2021. (nic, ) |
Filing 7 Letter from STEVEN MELEIKA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(sm) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case; the Clerk of the Court shall forward Petitioner a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis in a non-prisoner case and blank, non-prisoner civil complaint; if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, NJ 07101, within 60 days of the date of entry of this Order; that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either the filing fees or a complete in forma pauperis application, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff byregular U.S. mail; etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 10/14/2021. (sm) |
Filing 5 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 2:21-cv-04269. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 PRO SE TRANSFER LETTER, by STEVEN MELEIKA (sg, ) |
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/7/2021. 10/7/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (ps) |
Case Transferred to District of NEW JERSEY. (sg, ) |
PLEADINGS #2 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF BAYONNE, filed by STEVEN MELEIKA. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MELEIKA v. CITY OF BAYONNE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: STEVEN MELEIKA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CITY OF BAYONNE | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.