ARAGON v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE et al
| RODOLFO ARAGON |
| TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY, JUDGE KEVIN H MORSE, JUDGE DAVID STAHI, JUDGE SPERO KALAMBAKAS, PROSECUTOR HAROLD PARA and MATTHEW MURDOCK |
| 2:2021cv18304 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ISSUED as to SPERO KALAMBAKAS, KEVIN H MORSE, MATTHEW MURDOCK, PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY, HAROLD PARA, DAVID STAHI, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (adc, )
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (adc, )
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against SPERO KALAMBAKAS, KEVIN H MORSE, MATTHEW MURDOCK, PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY, HAROLD PARA, DAVID STAHI, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number NEW045463), filed by RODOLFO ARAGON.(adc, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. Receipt (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(adc, ) Modified on 10/14/2021 (adc, ).
|
|
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please note the #1 Complaint received, filed by the Clerk's office on 10/8/2021 was docketed in error. Please disregard. (adc, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
