CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC v. BHI ENERGY
CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC |
BHI ENERGY |
2:2021cv18543 |
October 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Hammer |
John Michael Vazquez |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion filed by BHI ENERGY re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Pro Hac Vice fee: $ 150, receipt number NEW045754 for LAURA GREENBERG-CHAO, ESQ. (ld, ) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion filed by CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Attachments: #1 Certification P. Papalia Certification, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - NJ Complaint, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #4 Statement Corporate Disclosure Statement, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(PEARL, AMY) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by AMY E. PEARL on behalf of CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC (PEARL, AMY) |
Filing 8 CONSENT ORDER granting #7 Application for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Laura Greenberg-Chao, Esq. etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/18/2021. (ams, ) |
Filing 7 Proposed Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Laura Greenberg-Chao, Esq. by Consent by BHI ENERGY. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Michael J. Epstein, Esq. in support, #2 Certification Certification of Laura Greenberg-Chao, Esq., #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Greenberg-Chao Certification)(RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 3:00 p.m. The parties will dial 1-888-684-8852 and access code 1456817# to join the conference. The parties shall electronically file a joint discovery plan by 2/22/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 11/5/2021. (jqb, ) Modified on 11/5/2021 (jqb, ). |
Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Motion set for 12/6/2021 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ams, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by BHI ENERGY. Responses due by 11/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Motion, #2 Declaration Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Rabasca Declaration, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Order)(RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #4 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by BHI ENERGY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/3/2021. (ams, ) |
Filing 4 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant BHI Energy.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BHI ENERGY identifying GOLD HOLDINGS LLC; BARTLETT HOLDINGS, INC. as Corporate Parent.. (RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 Exhibit to QC - Civil Cover Sheet JS44,, #1 Notice of Removal, Completed Civil Cover Sheet by BHI ENERGY. (RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed did not include a Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44), which is required to be submitted along with the initial pleading, as indicated in the Attorney Case Opening Guide. Please complete and file a #Civil Cover Sheet using the event Exhibit (to Document) found under Civil/Other Filings/Other Documents. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (ams, ) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (ams, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BHI ENERGY from The Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, case number BER-L-5908-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12891488), filed by BHI ENERGY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Service Certification of Service)(RABASCA, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC v. BHI ENERGY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CEM BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC | |
Represented By: | PATRICK PAPALIA |
Represented By: | AMY E. PEARL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BHI ENERGY | |
Represented By: | MICHAEL J. EPSTEIN |
Represented By: | MICHAEL A. RABASCA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.