NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC. v. ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC. et al
| NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC. |
| ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS WORLDWIDE DMCC, ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC and CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED |
| 2:2021cv19466 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jessica S Allen |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (nic, ) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
Filing 14
ORDER that the Defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended through and including March 22, 2022, re #13 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 2/14/2022. (qa, )
|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #13 Stipulation filed by ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC submitted by ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/22/2022. (qa, ) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC.. (LI, ZHIBIN) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by ZHIBIN LI on behalf of CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED, ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS WORLDWIDE DMCC (LI, ZHIBIN) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service on 1/25/2022, filed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service on 1/25/2022, filed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED, ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS WORLDWIDE DMCC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (qa, ) |
| Filing 5 AO120 Patent Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits) (qa, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW ADAM SKLAR on behalf of NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC. (SKLAR, MATTHEW) |
| Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Jessica S. Allen added. (ps) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. CIVIL COVER SHEET (CORRECTED). (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED, ZYDUS HEALTHCARE (USA) LLC, ZYDUS PHARMACEUTICALS (USA) INC., ZYDUS WORLDWIDE DMCC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12939649) , Related Case Selected, filed by NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 AO 120, #7 Certification Rule 11.2 Certification, #8 Certification Rule 201.1 Certification)(ARTILES, GUILLERMO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
