AHMAD v. NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| AHMAD ZAKARIYYA and ZAKARIYYA AHMAD |
| NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DETECTICVE E. MIRANDAR, DETECTIVE M. KRUZNIS, DETECTIVE R. HARRIS, RAHSAAN L. JOHNSON, DETECTIVE M. MATHIS and DETECTIVE B. HARRIS |
| 2:2021cv19996 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Ahmad Zakariyya, re #2 Memorandum and Order. (qa, ) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Zakariyya Ahmad re #1 . (qa, ) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. Upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or payment of the filing and administrative fees within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case. etc. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 11/19/2021. (qa, )
|
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support to Proceed IFP)(adc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
