STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY a/s/o EDWIN ORAMA and STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2021cv20046 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Edward S Kiel |
| Esther Salas |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
LETTER ORDER: A telephonic initial scheduling conference shall be held on February 10, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. The dial in number is 1-888-684-8852 and the access code is 310-0383#. The parties shall file a proposed Joint Discovery Plan no later than three business days before the scheduled initial conference. The Court's form Joint Discovery Plan can be found # here. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/27/2021. (sms)
|
| Notice of Judicial Preferences. #Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (ek) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint And Separate Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.(MAILLOUX, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL C. VACCARO on behalf of STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY (VACCARO, MICHAEL) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting the #5 Letter Request to extend the deadline for the United States to answer or respond to the Complaint to December 22, 2021 and extend the deadline for appearance of plaintiff's counsel to December 27, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/8/2021. (qa, )
|
| Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #5 submitted by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/22/2021. (qa, ) |
| Filing 5 Letter from the United States on Behalf of the Parties Respectfully Seeking a Two-week Extension of the United States' Deadline to Answer or Respond to the Complaint and State Farm to Have Counsel Appear. (MAILLOUX, MATTHEW) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Joshua Jaffe, Esq., has been directed by the Clerk of the Court to "hav[e] a member of the Bar of this Court file an appearance" on behalf of plaintiff. (ECF No. #2 .) Plaintiff is directed to retain admitted counsel who shall enter an appearance by December 13, 2021. Defendant's counsel is directed to provide notice of this text order to Mr. Jaffe. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 12/2/2021. (sms)
|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/8/2021. (qa, ) |
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant United States of America.. (MAILLOUX, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Attorney is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (ps) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA from Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, case number ESX-DC-015091-21., filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Certification of Scope of Federal Employment, #3 Exhibit C - Letter to State Court Regarding Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service)(MAILLOUX, MATTHEW) |
| Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel added. (ps) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
