RAIKOS-EVORA v. RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
| MARGARITA RAIKOS-EVORA |
| RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH X |
| 2:2021cv20048 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Andre M Espinosa |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Scheduling Initial R16 Conference set for 2/22/2022 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 12/15/2021. (spc)
|
| Filing 3 Certification on behalf of RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Parikh, Ana) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ps) |
| Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa added. (ps) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. identifying Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (Parikh, Ana) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County, case number HUD-L-2428-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12987318), filed by RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parikh, Ana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
