U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MALIK et al
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
USAMA MALIK and LAUREN S WOOD |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
2:2021cv20300 |
December 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Claire C Cecchi |
Michael A Hammer |
Securities/Commodities |
12 U.S.C. § 22 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 MOTION to Intervene by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Brief Memorandum of Law, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Stay Order)(BENVENUTO, OSMAR) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. LAUREN S WOOD waiver sent on 12/12/2021, answer due 2/10/2022. (SIVITZ, TRACY) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. USAMA MALIK waiver sent on 12/15/2021, answer due 2/14/2022. (SIVITZ, TRACY) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to USAMA MALIK, LAUREN S WOOD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TRACY ELLEN SIVITZ on behalf of U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SIVITZ, TRACY) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIVITZ, TRACY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.