PS Funding, Inc. v. 83 BOSTWICK LLC et al
PS Funding, Inc. |
83 BOSTWICK LLC, 132 WILKINSON AVENUE LLC, 286-288 FOREST STREET LLC, PETER AYTUG and Aeropi Stathatos |
2:2021cv20475 |
December 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Stanley R Chesler |
Edward S Kiel |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by PS Funding, Inc.. All Defendants. (MURTAUGH, ROBERT) |
Filing 2 TEXT ORDER: Case No. 21-17660, PS Funding, Inc. v. 83 Bostwick LLC, and Case No. 21-20475, PS Funding, Inc. v. 83 Bostwick LLC, are consolidated for the purposes of discovery and case management. Both cases shall remain open. As to Case No. 21-20475: (1) plaintiff is directed to have admitted counsel enter an appearance by January 18, 2022; and (2) the parties are referred to the case management order entered on December 22, 2021 in Case No. 21-17660 at ECF No. 9 . So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel on 1/13/2022. (sms) |
Case Assigned to Judge Stanley R. Chesler and Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel. (ak, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PETER AYTUG, Aeropi Stathatos from Gloucester County, case number GLO L 732 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC13039276), filed by PETER AYTUG, Aeropi Stathatos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt)(dd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.