SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC v. MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC
| SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC |
| MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC |
| 2:2021cv20501 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Esther Salas |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice fee for Craig E. Rothburd, Esq: $ 150, receipt number 046073 (mfr) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by BRUCE HELLER NAGEL on behalf of All Defendants (NAGEL, BRUCE) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extend Time to Answer Complaint to February 21, 2022 by All Defendants. (NAGEL, BRUCE) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig E. Rothburd; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 1/5/2022. (sm)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC. MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (BERGER, PHILLIP) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig E. Rothburd, Esquire by SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC. (BERGER, PHILLIP) |
| Set Deadlines as to #5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Craig E. Rothburd, Esquire. Motion set for 1/18/2022 before Judge Esther Salas. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (bt, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (bt, ) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC as to MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC. (BERGER, PHILLIP) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC. (BERGER, PHILLIP) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Esther Salas and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (ak, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-13043108), filed by SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(BERGER, PHILLIP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC v. MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SURGICAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SPV II, LLC | |
| Represented By: | PHILLIP D. BERGER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MCBRIDE SURGICAL CENTER, LLC | |
| Represented By: | BRUCE HELLER NAGEL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
